Titre : | ظوابط السلطة التقديرية لقاضي التحقيق |
Auteurs : | عبد الرحمان عوض رجا ملالحة, Auteur ; عثماني عبد الرحمان, Directeur de thèse |
Type de document : | texte manuscrit |
Editeur : | جامعة سعيدة -الدكتور مولاي الطاهر -كلية الحقوق والعلوم السياسية -قسم الحقوق, 2020/2021 |
Format : | 435ص |
Accompagnement : | CD |
Langues: | Arabe |
Index. décimale : | BUC-D 000045 |
Catégories : |
دكتوراه الطور الثالث حقوق تخصص قانون جنائي وعلوم جنائية فرع حقوق |
Mots-clés: | ظوابط :السلطة التقديرية :قاضي التحقيق |
Résumé : |
اﻟﻤﻠﺨﺺ
ﺬﻩ ﻗﻤﻨﺎ وﻗﺪ اﻟﺴﻠﻄﺔ ﳍﺬﻩ اﳌﻘﻴﺪة واﻟﻀﻮاﺑﻂ اﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮﻳﺔ اﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺳﻠﻄﺔ ﺗﺘﻀﻤﻦ اﻟﺪراﺳﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﻗﺎﺿﻲ ﺑﺪون ﺣﻜﻢ وﻻ ﲢﻘﻴﻖ ﻻ إذ ﻜﻢواﳊ اﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﰲ اﳌﻮﺿﻮع ﻫﺬا ﳘﻴﺔأ أدرﻛﻨﺎ أن ﺑﻌﺪ اﻟﺪراﺳﺔ ﻓﺬﻫﺐ ﻟﻠﻘﺎﺿﻲ اﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮﻳﺔ اﻟﺴﻠﻄﺔ وﺟﻮد أﺻﻞ ﰲ ﻧﻈﺮﻫﻢ وﺟﻬﺔ ﺗﺒﺎﻳﻨﺖ واﳌﻌﺎﺻﺮﻳﻦ اﻷﻗﺪﻣﲔ ﻓﺎﻟﻔﻘﻬﺎء اﳌﻌﱰﻓﻮن اﺧﺘﻠﻒ ﰒ وﺟﻮدﻫﺎ إﻧﻜﺎر إﱃ وﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ ﺑﻮﺟﻮدﻫﺎ اﻻﻋﱰاف إﱃ اﳉﻨﺎﺋﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻘﻪ ﺑﻌﻀﻬﻢ اﻟﺴﻠﻄﺔ ﺗﻠﻚ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺮ ﰲ اﻹﻓﺮاط إﱃ آﺧﺮون ذﻫﺐ ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ اﻻﻋﺘﺪال اﺧﺘﺎر ﻣﻦ ﻓﻬﻨﺎك اﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮﻳﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻠﻄﺔ .ﲢﻜﻢ ﺳﻠﻄﺔ ﺗﺸﺒﻪ اﻟﱵ ﻟﻠﺪرﺟﺔ اﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮﻳﺔ إﻳﻀﺎح إﱃ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻳﺔ ﺳﻠﻄﺔ ﻣﻦ اﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﳝﺎرﺳﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻋﺮض ﺧﻼل ﻣﻦ اﻟﺪراﺳﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺧﻠﺼﺖ وﻗﺪ ﳐﺘﻠﻒ ﰲ ﻘﺪﻳﺮﻳﺔاﻟﺘ اﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺳﻠﻄﺔ أن ﺑﻴﻨﺖ اﻟﺪراﺳﺔ ﻫﺬﻩ أن ﻛﻤﺎ اﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ ﰲ اﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺳﻠﻄﺎت أﻫﻢ ..واﻻﺳﺘﺒﺪاد اﻟﺘﻌﺴﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺎﺗﺼﻮ ﺑﻀﻮاﺑﻂ ﻣﻨﻀﺒﻄﺔ ﺳﻠﻄﺔ ﻫﻲ اﻟﻘﻀﺎء ﻣﺮاﺣﻞ Abstract: This study includes the Judge 's discretion and its restrictions. After realizing the importance of this issue in the investigation, and the ruling where there is no investigation, and no judgment without a judge, we carried out the study hereof. The " old and contemporary " jurists differed their view regarding the origin of the discretionary power of the judge, some of them admit its existence in criminal jurisprudence. By contrast, some deny it. However, the confessors of the judge’s discretion disagreed. There are those who chose moderation, while others went to overestimate that discretionary authority to the degree that resembles a controlling authority. The study hereof, by presenting the discretionary power exercised by judge, clarified the most important power of the judge in the investigation. It also showed that the judge’s discretionary authority, in the various stages of the judiciary, is an authority disciplined with controls that protect it from arbitrariness and tyranny. |
Note de contenu : |
اﻟﺒﺎباﻷول :ﻣﻔﻬﻮم اﻟﺴﻠﻄﺔ اﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮﻳﺔ ﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ اﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ 14
اﻟﻔﺼﻞاﻷول :اﻟﺘﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻠﻄﺔ اﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮﻳﺔ ﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ اﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ اﻟﻔﺼﻞاﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ :اﻟﻘﻴﻮد واﻟﻀﻮاﺑﻂ اﻟﻮاردة ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻠﻄﺔ ﻗﺎﺿﻲ اﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴق اﻟﺒﺎباﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ :اﻟﻘﻴﻮد واﻟﺼﻌﻮﺑﺎت اﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺤ ﺪﻣﻦ اﻟﺴﻠﻄﺔ اﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﺮﻳﺔ اﻟﻔﺼﻞاﻷول :اﺳﺘﺌﻨﺎف أواﻣﺮ اﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ وﺑﻄﻼن اﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴﻖ اﻟﻔﺼﻞاﻟﺜﺎﻧﻲ :اﻟﻘﻴﻮد واﻟﻀﻮاﺑﻂ اﻟﻮاردة ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻠﻄﺔ ﻗﺎﺿﻲ اﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴق . |
Exemplaires (1)
Code-barres | Cote | Support | Localisation | Section | Disponibilité |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUC-D 000045 | BUC-D 000045 | Livre | Bibliothèque PMB Services | Albums | Libre accès Disponible |
Documents numériques (1)
![]() BUC-D 000045 Adobe Acrobat PDF |